Despite Klein's obvious left-leaning political views, she is highly critical of Hillary Clinton and her 2016 presidential campaign. Are her criticisms genuine and supported by fact, or can they be seen as an active attempt to remain as impartial as possible in a highly subjective discussion?

At seemingly every mention of Clinton, Klein is highly critical not only professionally, but on the larger, conceptual level. Klein highlights that Clinton's charitable organization's efforts have been questioned worldwide, and her deep entrenchment in politics as usual makes her highly unpopular among progressives. Her criticisms of Clinton can be viewed more as an overall condemnation of leftist establishment politics rather than a personal attack or a literary tactic to balance the scales.

Does Klein's reliance on her own source material detract from her credibility? Would the text benefit from citations, footnotes, and the like?

Klein admittedly relies heavily on her own...