As a satirical comic novel, MOO offers of wealth of targets for analysis in terms of both what Smiley says about the modern university and what she implies about the culture in which it exists. Because it differs radically from her other novels, it also sheds light, by contrast, on these other works.

1. Does Smiley's depiction of the insecurities, foibles, and ambitions of her student characters ring true? Are there any groups or types of students she avoids including? Would they be suitable for satire?

2. What impression of the nature of teaching does the novel present? Is Smiley critical of the teaching students receive?

3. Are Smiley's faculty characters believable individuals or do they seem two-dimensional stereotypes? Would more three-dimensional characters be as comic?

4. What purpose does the fact that Ivar and Nils Harstad are twins serve?

5. In what ways is MOO critical of American government and...