1. Marie Isabelle Chevrier argues that the threat of chemical or biological terrorism is exaggerated. What reasons does she provide for why terrorists will not be inclined to use weapons of mass destruction? Do you find her argument persuasive? Explain your answer.

2. John Leifer maintains that the disintegration of the Soviet Union has greatly increased the risk of nuclear terrorism. Karl Heinz Kamp disagrees. Whose evidence do you find more convincing? Why"