This section contains 2,231 words (approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page) |
Fred Graham
In the following viewpoint, Fred Graham contends that despite the views of some judges, the public benefits when cameras are permitted in courtrooms. According to Graham, the resistance of judges to allow for the televising of trials is self-contradictory and runs counter to the public interest. He also maintains that courtroom cameras do not adversely affect the behavior of jurors or other trial participants. Instead, Graham argues, public viewing of trials ensures that proceedings are conducted fairly and informs Americans about important issues. Graham is the chief anchor and managing editor of Court TV.
As you read, consider the following questions:
1. Why does Graham believe that banning cameras from courtrooms runs counter to the public interest?
2. According to the author, how were courtrooms set up in early America?
3. According...
This section contains 2,231 words (approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page) |