1. Stephen Cox contends that the United States should kill terrorists who threaten America’s security as a way of deterring other terrorists. However, Stephen G. Cary argues that killing terrorists will only make other terrorists and potential terrorists angrier, thus breeding more terrorism. In your opinion, which author is more convincing? Please explain, citing from the texts.
2. Michael J. Glennon maintains that laws forbidding the use of force except in self-defense, as outlined in the UN Charter, are antiquated and can be legitimately ignored. In contrast, Richard Falk asserts that such laws are still binding, making it wrong to use preemptive force. Which author uses the UN Charter most persuasively to bolster his argument? Explain.
3. George W. Bush argues in favor of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, contending that a radical centralization of government agencies is necessary to fight terrorism. Ron Paul...