1. Richard Grenier suggests that the U.S. must defend itself from potential Islamic terrorism by launching a preemptive strike. Arthur Hoppe, on the other hand, argues that U.S. bombings of Muslim countries are an example of terrorism itself. Based on what you have read in these viewpoints, do you think that it is morally acceptable for the U.S. to attack its presumed enemies? Why or why not"

2. What assumptions does Richard Grenier make about Islam? How would Haroon Siddiqui respond to Grenier’s assumptions? Support your answer with examples from the viewpoints.