1. What social costs does the Economist claim are caused by legalized gambling? Do you find Frank J. Fahrenkopf Jr.’s denial of these costs persuasive? Why or why not?
2. The Economics Resource Group (ERG) describes the spread of Indian casinos as an enormously beneficial development for Native Americans, while David Pace points out that Indian gaming has disappointed many tribes. Based on the two viewpoints, do you agree with the ERG’s assessment that “the positive social and economic aspects of [Indian] gaming . . . far outweigh the negative”? Why or why not"