1. Robert Kelsey and Ted Westerman cite statistics that suggest that three-strikes laws are a cost-effective way to reduce crime, while Ryan S. King and Marc Mauer argue that the three-strikes laws may not be directly responsible. What evidence does each author give to support their viewpoints? Whose argument seems stronger? Defend your answer.
2. William Tucker cites statistics to support his claim that the death penalty deters crime. The American Civil Liberties Union contends that the death penalty is barbaric and discriminates against poor, Southern minorities. Which author’s argument is most persuasive? Defend your answer.
3. Families Against Mandatory Minimums argues that nonviolent drug offenders receive unduly harsh sentences under mandatory minimum sentencing regulations. How does John Roth counter this claim? Do you agree or disagree with FAMM’s view that mandatory minimum sentencing may result in excessive sentences? Explain your answer, giving specific examples...