What is the author's perspective in the book, Code Girls?

While Mundy’s primary perspective appears to be one of an investigative journalist, her personal anecdotes based on both oral and written first person accountings add an element of personal narrative. The primary narrative is that of Dot Braden, and her story which is woven through the work make the descriptions of the process of cryptanalysis come alive. In addition to conducting copious research at the National Archives, it is important to note that Mundy interviewed more than twenty surviving code breakers, which lends to the work’s authenticity and adds a new dimension to the perspective. These interviews allow for first person perspective in some instances.

As a journalist, Mundy provides the historical perspective and context in an effort to acclimate her audience to the tenor of the times. She clearly indicates the shift in perspective that results in times of war, and uses a vast array of resources carefully catalogued in the Notes section of the work at the end of the book. While she relies on numerous oral histories, it is important to note that, in keeping with the gender-biased times, oral histories of women were often not recorded. Mundy indicates her frustration with this fact when she pointedly declares: “Nobody knows how Agnes Driscoll felt. Nobody bothered to take an oral history from one of the greatest cryptanalysts in the world” (149). Her annoyance is palpable as her investment in the women whom she so painstakingly researched. This not her only frustration.

Mundy also makes clear her frustration with the sexism that ran rampant in the armed forces as well as the sometimes petty squabbles that occurred between the Army and Navy. As early as the Introduction she references their unabated competition, whether it be for personnel or credit for any accomplishments. This is particularly notable as the female code breakers do not receive any recognition at all. This work is easily viewed through the lens of feminism.