View a FREE sample

1. Why did Ressler see the first murder in this section as not being an ordinary murder?

Ressler didn't find the murder to be an ordinary murder because the victim was cut open and disemboweled. Also, animal feces were forced into some of her wounds.

2. What did the murderer do with the blood of the victim, according to the findings of officials?

The murderer seemed to have taken blood from the victim and drank it in the process of the ritual killing.

3. Why did Vorpagel react quickly to the crime that was presented to him in this first case?

Vorpagel reacted quickly to the crime as he realized the criminal was disorganized and deranged, so they posed a greater threat.

4. What is the profile that Ressler creates for the killer, when called into Vorpagel's case?

Ressler concludes the criminal is a white male who is psychotic and who possibly walked into the scene of the crime.

(read all 60 Short Essay Questions and Answers)

This section contains 2,314 words (approx. 8 pages at 300 words per page) View a FREE sample