1. What does Juror Three do to infuriate Juror Eight in Act II?
(a) He tries to play tic-tac-toe with Juror Twelve.
(b) He strikes up a private conversation with Juror Twelve.
(c) He takes out his notepad and starts drawing.
(d) He takes out his newspaper and starts reading.

2. What important shift in the attitude of many jurors takes place during the debates in Act II about the case?
(a) They are more agitated because so much time is passing.
(b) They become calmer and participate less in the discussion.
(c) They become more sober and thoughtful in discussing the issues.
(d) They withdraw and consider their own feelings.

3. How old was the defendant when he lost his mother?
(a) Eleven years old.
(b) Six years old.
(c) Nine years old.
(d) Thirteen years old.

4. How does Juror Eight help to lead the others to a logical conclusion about the eyewitness discussed in Act III?
(a) He asks whether they would have had their glasses on in bed.
(b) He asks whether they would have had their hearing aids on in bed.
(c) He asks whether they would have their walking stick in bed.
(d) He asks whether someone with a limp could have moved that quickly to the window.

5. How does the involvement of the jury in acting out and assessing the allegations of the old man compare with their earlier attitude towards the evidence?
(a) It represents the trend towards a more reasonable, analytical approach
(b) It shows they no longer believe the evidence.
(c) It shows they think the defendant might be innocent.
(d) It shows they are now willing to forget about their personal views.