This section contains 244 words (approx. 1 page at 300 words per page) |
![]() |
Justice Antonin Scalia, delivering the majority opinion in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992), noted:
We think, in short, that there are good reasons for our frequently expressed belief that, when the owner of real property has been called upon to sacrifice all economically beneficial uses in the name of the common good, that is, to leave his property economically idle, he has suffered a taking . . .
Whether Lucas's construction of single family residences on his parcels should be described as bringing" harm" to South Carolina's adjacent ecological resources thus depends principally upon whether the describer believes that the State's use interest in nurturing those resources is so important that any competing adjacent use must yield.
When it is understood that "prevention of harmful use" was merely our early formulation of the police power justification necessary to sustain (without compensation) any regulatory diminution in...
This section contains 244 words (approx. 1 page at 300 words per page) |
![]() |