This section contains 1,285 words (approx. 5 pages at 300 words per page) |
Pros and Cons of Sequestering Trial Juries
Summary: A short history of jury sequestering in the United States and how this practice is performed today on a state-by-state basis. The use of sequestering a jury is examined in the rape case of basketball star Kobe Bryant as well as the double-murder trial of O.J. Simpson. The author argues in favor of sequestering the Bryant trial jurors.
The first case of jury sequestering in America occurred in the week or so long trial of the Boston Massacre in 1770. In the twentieth century, jurisdictions began to move away from mandatory sequestering of juries. Previously, in both criminal and civil cases, jury sequestering was mandatory. Now sequestration is on a state-to-state basis. In most states, sequestering of the jury is no longer mandatory even in capital cases.
Due to the excessive media coverage of this case, I do believe the jury should be sequestered. Kobe Bryant is a very high profile athlete with many supporters as well as those who believe he is guilty. A sequestered jury would benefit both the prosecution and defense. The isolation of the jury would help to ensure a fair trial by preventing exposure to prejudicial publicity. In a jury trial, the evidence the jurors use to render a verdict should come...
This section contains 1,285 words (approx. 5 pages at 300 words per page) |