John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both agreed that a ruler of some sort is absolutely necessary for a country to thrive and flourish. Without a leader, the country would fall away. Hobbes and Locke's both have totally different views on how people are and human nature. Hobbes states that we are born devilish and nasty. On the other hand Locke sees humans as innocent and blank minded.

Hobbes point of view on human nature and how a government should be run is a more realistic way of looking at things than John Locke's theory. For example in the Egyptian government Hobbes point of you is mainly in what's the people's mind, he believes that without rules nothing would be settled and it will be worse than this. Both Hobbes and Locke see human nature differently, Hobbes sees people as being selfish while Locke says that people are naturally...