Book Review of "Freud for Historians" Essay | Essay

This student essay consists of approximately 7 pages of analysis of Book Review of "Freud for Historians".

Book Review of "Freud for Historians" Essay | Essay

This student essay consists of approximately 7 pages of analysis of Book Review of "Freud for Historians".
This section contains 1,831 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Student Essay on Book Review of "Freud for Historians"

Book Review of "Freud for Historians"

Summary: Author Peter Gay debunks misunderstanding about Freudian psychoanalytical theory in "Freud for Historians." The author both supports and attacks "psychoanalytic historians" who used Sigmund Freud's theories to analyze historical events.
Freud for Historians. By Peter Gay. (Oxford University Press, 1985. Pp. vii + 252. Preface, bibliography, acknowledgments, index.)

Freud for Historians is an argument, presented by Peter Gay, which deals with psychoanalysis in historical writing. This topic of interest is a heated debate among historians. The argument is a final book in a trilogy Gay did not intend to write. Freud for Historians follows two historiographical books, Style in History and its sequel about causation, Art and Act (p. viii). In his book, Gay presents a strong defense against misunderstandings of psychoanalytic theory.

He is developing his discussion on a principle he had discussed in Art and Act. Peter Gay, being a professional on Freud, is attacking the critics of psychohistory, and even more in depth the psychoanalytic historian. The main point of the text is to emphasize to its critics that psychoanalysis can help historians not only learn what happened...

(read more)

This section contains 1,831 words
(approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page)
Buy the Student Essay on Book Review of "Freud for Historians"
Copyrights
BookRags
Book Review of "Freud for Historians" from BookRags. (c)2024 BookRags, Inc. All rights reserved.