This section contains 240 words (approx. 1 page at 300 words per page) |
The Success of Appeasement in World War II
Summary: Examines the Appeasement Policy Great Britain and France had toward Germany at the beginning of World War II. Discusses if the policy was justified.
During the period of Appeasement, 1935 - 1939, both Hitler's ambitions and competence had grown drastically, which led the world into WWII. Although the Appeasement policy agreed by Britain, France and Germany seemed to be the most perceptible factor that bred Hitler's ambitions and self-confidence, it should not be fully unjustified. Britain and France were no doubt in an ambiguous position as Hitler began his reversal of the Treaty of Versailles. Economical problems were intense, which also influenced the British armed forces as Chamberlain believed they were out-dated and unable to undertake a war against Germany. Chamberlain had also thought that he was able to manipulate Hitler's actions through the policy of Appeasement as in using him to impair communism. He had also been exceptionally sympathetic and therefore considered Appeasement as a way to act contrite towards Hitler due to the unfair Treaty of Versailles. However as Hitler had continuously breached promises of seizing his invasion of other nations, Chamberlain should have withdrew the Appeasement policy promptly to obstruct Hitler's ambitions, yet in reality, he took no evident action in necessary impediments.
Appeasement should not be fully unjustified, if it wasn't because of this policy, Hitler's army might have already annihilated Britain and France, which will then speed up the process of his ambition goals, nevertheless, the process of Appeasement should have been manipulated and modeled in more efficient manner as prevention actions towards Hitler should have been undertaken punctually.
This section contains 240 words (approx. 1 page at 300 words per page) |