This section contains 1,830 words (approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page) |
![]() |
World Systems Theory in Archaeology
Summary: Discusses the adaptation of world systems to archaeology, as detailed in Wallerstein's article. Examines weaknesses in the theory. Defines the difference between "new" linear events that result from progress over time, and those occurrences that can be explained as historical-cyclical tendencies.
These papers deal with the world systems theory of Wallerstien's article as well as the other specialists' criticisms on it. They bring up basically three main ideas, which first off, include the significant role of the periphery in the core- periphery relationship. Secondly, the need to focus on internal and local affects on interrelations between different polities instead of concentrating on the external and generalized role of interaction. Lastly, they demand a model that is diversified enough to allow for analyzation of various levels of interaction between different groups.
In Halls article, he points out that this theory has a few weaknesses, such as its basis is on only one situation of modern times, which does not always have applications to past societies. It is necessary to define the difference between "new" linear events that result from progress over time, and those occurrences that can be explained as...
This section contains 1,830 words (approx. 7 pages at 300 words per page) |
![]() |