and instructive, that it tempts us to venture on a
digression. Long before Frances Burney was born,
Mr. Crisp had made his entrance into the world, with
every advantage. He was well connected and well
educated. His face and figure were conspicuously
handsome; his manners were polished; his fortune was
easy; his character was without stain ; he lived in
the best society; he had read much ; he talked well;
his taste in literature, music, painting, architecture,
sculpture, was held in high esteem. Nothing that
the world can give seemed to be wanting to his happiness
and respectability, except that he should understand
the limits of his powers, and should not throw away
distinctions which were within his reach in the pursuit
of distinctions which were unattainable. " It is an
uncontrolled truth,” says Swift, “that
no man ever made an ill figure who understood his
own talents, nor a good one who mistook them.”
Every day brings with it fresh illustrations of this
weighty saying ; but the best commentary that we remember
is the history of Samuel Crisp. Men like him
have their proper place, and it is a most important
one, in the Commonwealth of Letters. It is by
the judgment of such men that the rank of authors is
finally determined. It is neither to the multitude,
nor to the few who are gifted with great creative
genius, that we are to look for sound critical decisions.
The multitude, unacquainted with the best models,
are captivated by whatever stuns and dazzles them.
They deserted Mrs. Siddons to run after Master Betty;
and they now prefer, we have no doubt, Jack Sheppard
to Van Artevelde. A man of great original genius,
on the other hand, a man who has attained to mastery
in some high walk of art, is by no means to be implicitly
trusted as a judge of the performances of others.
The erroneous decisions pronounced by such men are
without number. It is commonly supposed that
jealousy makes them unjust. But a more creditable
explanation may easily be found. The very excellence
of a work shows that some of the faculties of the
author have been developed at the expense of the rest
— for it is not given to the human intellect
to expand itself widely in all directions at once
and to be at the same time gigantic and well-proportioned.
Whoever becomes pre-eminent in any art, nay, in any
style of art, generally does so by devoting himself
with intense and exclusive enthusiasm to the pursuit
of one kind of excellence. His perception of
other Page xx
kinds of excellence is too often impaired. Out of his own department, he blames at random, and is far less to be trusted than the mere connoisseur, who produces nothing, and whose business is only to judge and enjoy. One painter is distinguished by his exquisite finishing. He toils day after day to bring the veins of a cabbage leaf, the folds of a lace veil, the wrinkles of an old woman’s face, nearer and nearer to perfection. In the time which he employs on a square foot of canvas,