The Chairman—­“The Committee will—­when it desires to know.”

Mr. Noble—­“Which will not be daring this century perhaps.”

The Chairman—­“Another remark like that, sir, will procure you the attentions of the Sergeant-at-arms.”

Mr. Noble—­“D—­n the Sergeant-at-arms, and the Committee too!”

Several Committeemen—­“Mr. Chairman, this is Contempt!”

Mr. Noble—­“Contempt of whom?”

“Of the Committee!  Of the Senate of the United States!”

Mr. Noble—­“Then I am become the acknowledged representative of a nation.  You know as well as I do that the whole nation hold as much as three-fifths of the United States Senate in entire contempt.—­Three-fifths of you are Dilworthys.”

The Sergeant-at-arms very soon put a quietus upon the observations of the representative of the nation, and convinced him that he was not, in the over-free atmosphere of his Happy-Land-of-Canaan: 

The statement of Senator Dilworthy naturally carried conviction to the minds of the committee.—­It was close, logical, unanswerable; it bore many internal evidences of its, truth.  For instance, it is customary in all countries for business men to loan large sums of money in bank bills instead of checks.  It is customary for the lender to make no memorandum of the transaction.  It is customary, for the borrower to receive the money without making a memorandum of it, or giving a note or a receipt for it’s use—­the borrower is not likely to die or forget about it.  It is customary to lend nearly anybody money to start a bank with especially if you have not the money to lend him and have to borrow it for the purpose.  It is customary to carry large sums of money in bank bills about your person or in your trunk.  It is customary to hand a large sure in bank bills to a man you have just been introduced to (if he asks you to do it,) to be conveyed to a distant town and delivered to another party.  It is not customary to make a memorandum of this transaction; it is not customary for the conveyor to give a note or a receipt for the money; it is not customary to require that he shall get a note or a receipt from the man he is to convey it to in the distant town.  It would be at least singular in you to say to the proposed conveyor, “You might be robbed; I will deposit the money in a bank and send a check for it to my friend through the mail.”

Very well.  It being plain that Senator Dilworthy’s statement was rigidly true, and this fact being strengthened by his adding to it the support of “his honor as a Senator,” the Committee rendered a verdict of “Not proven that a bribe had been offered and accepted.”  This in a manner exonerated Noble and let him escape.

The Committee made its report to the Senate, and that body proceeded to consider its acceptance.  One Senator indeed, several Senators—­objected that the Committee had failed of its duty; they had proved this man Noble guilty of nothing, they had meted out no punishment to him; if the report were accepted, he would go forth free and scathless, glorying in his crime, and it would be a tacit admission that any blackguard could insult the Senate of the United States and conspire against the sacred reputation of its members with impunity; the Senate owed it to the upholding of its ancient dignity to make an example of this man Noble —­he should be crushed.