“Under the guise of appointing a committee to investigate the late Mr. Dilworthy, the Senate yesterday appointed a committee to investigate his accuser, Mr. Noble.  This is the exact spirit and meaning of the resolution, and the committee cannot try anybody but Mr. Noble without overstepping its authority.  That Dilworthy had the effrontery to offer such a resolution will surprise no one, and that the Senate could entertain it without blushing and pass it without shame will surprise no one.  We are now reminded of a note which we have received from the notorious burglar Murphy, in which he finds fault with a statement of ours to the effect that he had served one term in the penitentiary and also one in the U. S. Senate.  He says, ’The latter statement is untrue and does me great injustice.’  After an unconscious sarcasm like that, further comment is unnecessary.”

And yet the Senate was roused by the Dilworthy trouble.  Many speeches were made.  One Senator (who was accused in the public prints of selling his chances of re-election to his opponent for $50,000 and had not yet denied the charge) said that, “the presence in the Capital of such a creature as this man Noble, to testify against a brother member of their body, was an insult to the Senate.”

Another Senator said, “Let the investigation go on and let it make an example of this man Noble; let it teach him and men like him that they could not attack the reputation of a United States-Senator with impunity.”

Another said he was glad the investigation was to be had, for it was high time that the Senate should crush some cur like this man Noble, and thus show his kind that it was able and resolved to uphold its ancient dignity.

A by-stander laughed, at this finely delivered peroration; and said: 

“Why, this is the Senator who franked his, baggage home through the mails last week-registered, at that.  However, perhaps he was merely engaged in ’upholding the ancient dignity of the Senate,’—­then.”

“No, the modern dignity of it,” said another by-stander.  “It don’t resemble its ancient dignity but it fits its modern style like a glove.”

There being no law against making offensive remarks about U. S. Senators, this conversation, and others like it, continued without let or hindrance.  But our business is with the investigating committee.

Mr. Noble appeared before the Committee of the Senate; and testified to the following effect: