by accusing him.  An Indian government has only to let it be understood that it wishes a particular man to be ruined, and in twenty-four hours it will be furnished with grave charges, supported by depositions so full and circumstantial that any person unaccustomed to Asiatic mendacity would regard them as decisive.  It is well if the signature of the destined victim is not counterfeited at the foot of some illegal compact, and if some treasonable paper is not slipped into a hiding-place in his house.”

That was nearly a century and a quarter ago.  An article in one of the chief journals of India (the Pioneer) shows that in some respects the native of to-day is just what his ancestor was then.  Here are niceties of so subtle and delicate a sort that they lift their breed of rascality to a place among the fine arts, and almost entitle it to respect: 

“The records of the Indian courts might certainly be relied upon to prove that swindlers as a class in the East come very close to, if they do not surpass, in brilliancy of execution and originality of design the most expert of their fraternity in Europe and America.  India in especial is the home of forgery.  There are some particular districts which are noted as marts for the finest specimens of the forger’s handiwork.  The business is carried on by firms who possess stores of stamped papers to suit every emergency.  They habitually lay in a store of fresh stamped papers every year, and some of the older and more thriving houses can supply documents for the past forty years, bearing the proper water-mark and possessing the genuine appearance of age.  Other districts have earned notoriety for skilled perjury, a pre-eminence that excites a respectful admiration when one thinks of the universal prevalence of the art, and persons desirous of succeeding in false suits are ready to pay handsomely to avail themselves of the services of these local experts as witnesses.”

Various instances illustrative of the methods of these swindlers are given.  They exhibit deep cunning and total depravity on the part of the swindler and his pals, and more obtuseness on the part of the victim than one would expect to find in a country where suspicion of your neighbor must surely be one of the earliest things learned.  The favorite subject is the young fool who has just come into a fortune and is trying to see how poor a use he can put it to.  I will quote one example: 

“Sometimes another form of confidence trick is adopted, which is invariably successful.  The particular pigeon is spotted, and, his acquaintance having been made, he is encouraged in every form of vice.  When the friendship is thoroughly established, the swindler remarks to the young man that he has a brother who has asked him to lend him Rs.10,000.  The swindler says he has the money and would lend it; but, as the borrower is his brother, he cannot charge interest.  So