4.  The Christian “Sodalitia” were not merely religious bodies, but friendly societies, burial societies, and guilds.  They hung together for all purposes—­the mob hated them as it now hates the Jews in Eastern Europe, because they were more frugal, more industrious, and lived better lives than their neighbours, while they stuck together like Scotchmen.

If these things are so—­and I appeal to your knowledge of history that they are so—­what has the success of Christianity to do with the truth or falsehood of the story of Jesus?

I am, yours very faithfully,

T.H.  Huxley.

[The following letter was written in reply to one from Mr. Clodd on the first of the articles in this controversy.  This article, it must be remembered, not only replied to Dr. Wace’s attack, but at the same time bantered Mr. Frederic Harrison’s pretensions on behalf of Positivism at the expense alike of Christianity and Agnosticism.]

3 Jevington Gardens, Eastbourne, February 19, 1889.

My dear Mr. Clodd,

I am very much obliged to you for your cheery and appreciative letter. 
If I do not empty all Harrison’s vials of wrath I shall be astonished! 
But of all the sickening humbugs in the world, the sham pietism of the
Positivists is to me the most offensive.

I have long been wanting to say my say about these questions, but my hands were too full.  This time last year I was so ill that I thought to myself, with Hamlet, “the rest is silence.”  But my wiry constitution has unexpectedly weathered the storm, and I have every reason to believe that with renunciation of the devil and all his works (i.e. public speaking, dining and being dined, etc.) my faculties may be unimpaired for a good spell yet.  And whether my lease is long or short, I mean to devote them to the work I began in the paper on the Evolution of Theology.

You will see in the next “Nineteenth” a paper on the Evidence of
Miracles, which I think will be to your mind.

Hutton is beginning to drivel!  There really is no other word for it. [This refers to an article in the “Spectator” on “Professor Huxley and Agnosticism,” February 9, 1889, which suggests, with regard to demoniac possession, that the old doctrine of one spirit driving out another is as good as any new explanation, and fortifies this conclusion by a reference to the phenomena of hypnotism.]

Ever yours very faithfully,

T.H.  Huxley.

[To the same:—­]

4 Marlborough Place, April 15, 1889.

My dear Mr. Clodd,

The adventurous Mr. C. wrote to me some time ago.  I expressed my regret that I could do nothing for the evolution of tent-pegs.  What wonderful people there are in the world!

Many thanks for calling my attention to “Antiqua Mater.”  I will look it up.  I have such a rooted objection to returning books, that I never borrow one or allow anybody to lend me one if I can help it.