individuals; as economic conditions are straightened
out, universal education will become practically feasible.
It is not only as a matter of justice, but in the
interests of public welfare, that education should
be given to all. It will actually pay in dollars
and cents, in increased efficiency, more intelligent
voting, decreased crime, decreased commercial prostitution,
and crazy propaganda of all sorts. The city of
Boston was right in inscribing on its public library
the motto: “The commonwealth requires the
education of the people as the safeguard of order
and liberty.” What can be done by eugenics?
Environment and education are of enormous importance
in determining what the mature individual shall be.
But the result is strictly limited by the material
they have to work upon; the individual who is handicapped
by heredity cannot expect to catch up with him who
starts the race of life better equipped, if both have
equally favorable influences and opportunities.
These influences can effect little permanent improvement
in the human stock; that can only be radically bettered
by seeing to it that individuals of superior stock
have children and those of inferior stock do not.
We have “harnessed heredity” to produce
better types of wheat and roses and cattle and horses
and dogs; why not produce better types of men?
The study of these possibilities constitutes the new
science of eugenics, which its founder, Francis Galton,
defined as the study of “those agencies which
humanity through social control may use for the improvement
or the impairment of the racial qualities of future
generations.” Dr. Kellogg defines it as
“taking advantage of the facts of heredity to
make the human race better.” “Good
breeding of the human species.” We may first
ask what duties the disclosures of this new science
lay upon the individual.
(1) The constitutional health of children is partly
deter parents at the time of conception and birth.
Most deaths of newborn infants are due to prenatal
influences. Overstrain, malnutrition, alcoholism,
and all physical excesses tend to cause physical degeneracy
in the offspring. It is obviously the duty of
prospective parents- and that means practically all
healthy young people-to keep themselves well and strong,
so as to give a good endowment of health to their children.
(2) Feeble-mindedness, epilepsy, some forms of insanity,
and some venereal diseases are inheritable defects;
those who suffer from them must refrain from having
children. Studies of the “Jukes” family
and the “Kallikak” family, and others,
show convincingly the spread of these defects where
defectives marry. To bring children into the world
to bear such burdens-and to cost the State, as they
are almost sure to, for their support [Footnote:
The descendants of the original degenerate couple
of “Jukes” cost New York State in seventy-five
years $1,300,000. See R. L. Dugdale, The Jukes.
H. H. Goddard, The Kallikak Family]-ought to be regarded
as a grave sin.