longer be endured.[Footnote: Cf. Ettor (quoted
in Outlook, vol. 101, p. 340): “They tell
us to get what we want by the ballot. They want
us to play the game according to the established rules.
But the rules were made by the capitalists. They
have laid down the laws of the game. They
hold the pick of the cards. We never can win by
political methods. The right of suffrage is the
greatest hoax of history. Direct action is the
only way.”] There is a great deal of idealism
among the advocates of violence;[Footnote: Cf,
for example, Giovannitti’s poem, The Cage, in
the Atlantic Monthly, June, 1913.] there is a great
deal of sympathy on the part of the public with lawless
strikers, with the I.W.W. gangs that have recently
invaded city churches, with all those under-dogs who
are now determining to have a share in the good things
of life. Unless the employing and governing classes
meet their demands halfway, gunpowder and dynamite
pretty surely lie ahead. Will the spirit of lawlessness
spread? Ought we to slacken our process of lawmaking
lest we make the yoke too hard to bear? As a
matter of fact, it is through more laws, better laws,
and a better mechanism for punishing infraction of
laws, that we can hope to check lawlessness. Lynching-as
we noted in chapter xxv-have been the product
of inadequate legislation and judicial procedure;
as our laws against the worst crimes become sharper,
our police forces more efficient, and our court trials
quicker and less hampered by technicalities, they
decrease in number. As education on the liquor
question spreads, violations of prohibition laws become
fewer. The kind of lawlessness that is on the
increase is that which exists as a protest against
and a means of remedying evils that the laws have
not yet properly dealt with. Give us by law an
industrial code that will minimize the exploitation
of the weak by the strong, bringing a good measure
of security and comfort to all, and such outrages
as those of the McNamara brothers will cease, or at
worst will be merely sporadic and generally condemned.
Allow present conditions to drift on without sharp
legal guidance, and such outrages will certainly become
more and more numerous. The alternative that
confronts the modern world is plainly evolution by
law or revolution by violence. Individualism:
J. S. Mill, On Liberty. H. Spencer, Principles
of Ethics, part iv, chaps, xxv-xxix; Social
Statics; and many other writings. J. H. Levy,
The Outcome of Individualism. Various publications
of the British Personal Rights Association. W.
Donisthorpe, Individualism. W. Fite, Individualism,
lect. IV. Legal control: Florence Kelley,
Some Ethical Gains through Legislation. Jane
Addams, Newer Ideals of Peace. E. A. Ross, Social
Control, chap. XXXI. D. S. Ritchie, Principles
of State Interference. J. W. Jenks, Government
Action for Social Welfare. A. V. Dicey, Law and
Opinion. J. Seth, Study of Ethical Principles,
pp. 297-331. H. C. Potter, Relation of the Individual