his privilege and glad desire. To be conscious
of belonging to a social group, whose interests are
regarded as one’s own, to mourn its disasters
and rejoice in its successes, and give one’s
hands and brains without reluctance, when needed, to
its service- that is patriotism. For the individual,
its value is that it widens his sympathies, gives
him new interests, stimulates his ambition, warms
his heart with a sense of brotherhood in common hopes
and fears; the “man without a country”
is, as Dr. Bale’s story graphically depicted,
like a man without a home; the “citizens of
the world,” who voluntarily expatriate themselves,
miss much of the tang of life that is tasted by him
who keeps his local attachments and national loyalty.
For the State, its value is that it welds men together,
softens their civil strife, lifts them above petty
jealousies, rouses them to maintain the common weal
against all dangers, external and internal. Especially
in view of our hybrid population is it necessary to
stimulate patriotism, by the celebration of national
anniversaries, the salutation of the flag in the public
schools, and whatever other means help to enlist the
emotions on the side of civic consciousness. But
while seeking to foster patriotism, for its great
potentialities of good, we must guard diligently against
its lapse into forms that are really harmful to the
community which it avowedly serves. Like every
other great emotion, it needs to be controlled, developed
along the lines of greatest usefulness, directed into
proper channels. How should patriotism be directed
and qualified?
(1) Patriotism must be rationalized, so as to be an
enthusiasm for the really great and admirable phases
of the national life. Instead of a pride in the
prowess of army and navy, of yachts or athletes, it
should become a pride in national efficiency and health,
in the national art, literature, statesmanship, and
educational system, in the beauty of public buildings
and the standards of public manners and morals.
It should think not so much of defending by force the
national “honor,” as of maintaining standards
of honor that shall be worth defending. There
may, indeed, still be occasions when we can learn
the truth of the old Roman verse, Dulce et decorum
est pro patria mori; but the newer patriotism consists
not so much in willingness to die as in willingness
to live, for one’s country-to take the trouble
to study conditions, to vote, and to work for the improvement
of conditions and the invigorating of the national
life. The real anti-patriots are not the peace-men,
but the selfish and unscrupulous money-makers, the
idle rich, the dissolute, the ill-mannered, all those
who put private interest or passion above the public
weal, help to weaken national strength and solidarity,
and bring our country’s name into disrepute.