Mrs. Ritchie’s introduction to Contributions to Punch.

The Book of Snobs brought Thackeray into notice, and now that he was becoming well known and making more money, he once more made a home for his daughters, and they came to London to live with their father.  Everything was new and strange to the little girls.  There was a feeling of London they thought, in the new house, and “London smelt of tobacco.”  Thus once more, says his daughter, “after his first happy married years, my father had a home and a family—­if a house, two young children, three servants, and a little black cat can be called a family.”

Thackeray was a very big man, being six feet three or four.  He must have seemed a very big papa to the little girls of six and eight, who were, no doubt, very glad to be again beside their great big kind father, and he, on his side, was very glad to have his little girls to love, and he took them about a great deal to the theater and concerts.  They helped him in many little ways and thought it joy to leave lessons in the schoolroom upstairs and come downstairs to help father, and be posed as models for his drawings.

It was now that Thackeray wrote his first great novel, his greatest some people think, Vanity Fair.  I cannot tell you about it now, but when you are a very little older you will like to read of clever and disagreeable Becky Sharp, of dear Dobbin, and foolish Amelia, and all the rest of the interesting people Thackeray creates for us.  Thackeray has been called a cynic, that is one who does not believe in the goodness of human nature, and who sneers at and finds fault with everything.  And reading Vanity Fair when we are very young we are apt to think that is so, but later we come to see the heart of goodness there is in him, and when we have read his books we say to ourselves, “What a truly good man Thackeray must have been.”  “He could not have painted Vanity Fair as he has,” says another writer,* “unless Eden had been shining brightly in his inner eyes.”

George Brimley.

Though Thackeray is no cynic he is a satirist as much as Pope or Dryden, but the most kindly satirist who ever wrote.  His thrusts are keen and yet there is always a humorous laugh behind, and never a spark of malice or uncharitableness.  Thackeray bore no hatred in his heart towards any man.  He could not bear to give pain, and as he grew older his satire became more gentle even than at first, and he regretted some of his earlier and too sharp sayings.

After Vanity Fair other novels followed, the best of all being Esmond.  Esmond is perhaps the finest historical novel in our language.  It is a story of the time of Queen Anne, and when we read it we feel as if the days of Addison and Steele lived again.  But with Thackeray the historical novel is very different from the historical novel of Scott.  With Thackeray his imaginary people hold the chief place, the real people only form a background, while in many of Scott’s novels the real people claim our attention most.