1909 L’ORGANISATION des Congres de
philosophie.
Article in the Bulletin de la Societe
francaise de philosophie,
Jan., 1909.
1909 Vocabulaire philosophique.
Collaboration Bulletin de la Societe
francaise de philosophie,
Aug., 1909.
1910 Rapport sur un ouvrage de
M. Wendell.
La France d’aujourd hui.
Seances de l’Academie des
sciences morales et politques.
1910 Rapport sur le concours pour
les prix
“Charles
L’EVEQUE.”
Seances de l’Academie des
sciences morales et politiques.
1910 James et Bergson.
Remarques a propos d’un article
de Mr. W. B. Pitkin,
intitule James and Bergson,
or, Who is against Intellect?
Mr. Pitkin’s article appeared
in the Journal of Philosophy,
Psychology, and Scientific
Methods on April 28, 1910.
Bergson’s reply
appeared in the same journal on July
7th of the same year.
1910 New introduction written in
English for
the English
translation of matiere
et memoire.
This new introduction was subsequently
translated
into French and prefaced
to the next French edition of
Matiere et Memoire which
appeared. This was the
seventh edition.
The English translation by Nancy
Margaret Paul and W.
Scott Palmer was published in
1911 (see note under
date 1896).
The new introduction called attention
mainly to the
change in orthodox opinion
regarding aphasia which
had come about since
the original publication of the
work in French in 1896—a
change of view which only
served to make Bergson’s
opinions appear less novel and
more probable.
1910 Rapport sur un ouvrage de
M. DAURIAC.
Le musicien-poete Wagner: etude
de psychologie musicale.
Seances de l’Academie des
sciences morales et politiques.
1910 Rapport sur un ouvrage de
M. JOUSSAIN.
entitule:—
Le Fondement psychologique de la
morale.
Seances de l’Academie des
sciences morales et politiques.
1910 L’INCONSCIENT dans la vie
mentale
Remarques a propos d’une these
soutenue par M.
Dwelshauvers (Now Belgian
Professor.) An address
delivered to the Societe
in the previous November.
Published in the Bulletin
de la Societe francaise de
philosophie, Feb., 1910.
Here Bergson has another encounter
with a critic.
As far back as 1901 Bergson contributed to
this same periodical
an article bearing this title. M.
Georges Dwelshauvers
criticized Bergson’s views in his articles—