them in the purest mother tongue.  He had nearly brought Mrs. Crisparkle’s grey hairs with sorrow to the grave.  (Those original expressions were Mr. Sapsea’s.) He had repeatedly said he would have Mr. Crisparkle’s life.  He had repeatedly said he would have everybody’s life, and become in effect the last man.  He had been brought down to Cloisterham, from London, by an eminent Philanthropist, and why?  Because that Philanthropist had expressly declared:  ’I owe it to my fellow-creatures that he should be, in the words of Bentham, where he is the cause of the greatest danger to the smallest number.’

These dropping shots from the blunderbusses of blunderheadedness might not have hit him in a vital place.  But he had to stand against a trained and well-directed fire of arms of precision too.  He had notoriously threatened the lost young man, and had, according to the showing of his own faithful friend and tutor who strove so hard for him, a cause of bitter animosity (created by himself, and stated by himself), against that ill-starred fellow.  He had armed himself with an offensive weapon for the fatal night, and he had gone off early in the morning, after making preparations for departure.  He had been found with traces of blood on him; truly, they might have been wholly caused as he represented, but they might not, also.  On a search-warrant being issued for the examination of his room, clothes, and so forth, it was discovered that he had destroyed all his papers, and rearranged all his possessions, on the very afternoon of the disappearance.  The watch found at the Weir was challenged by the jeweller as one he had wound and set for Edwin Drood, at twenty minutes past two on that same afternoon; and it had run down, before being cast into the water; and it was the jeweller’s positive opinion that it had never been re-wound.  This would justify the hypothesis that the watch was taken from him not long after he left Mr. Jasper’s house at midnight, in company with the last person seen with him, and that it had been thrown away after being retained some hours.  Why thrown away?  If he had been murdered, and so artfully disfigured, or concealed, or both, as that the murderer hoped identification to be impossible, except from something that he wore, assuredly the murderer would seek to remove from the body the most lasting, the best known, and the most easily recognisable, things upon it.  Those things would be the watch and shirt-pin.  As to his opportunities of casting them into the river; if he were the object of these suspicions, they were easy.  For, he had been seen by many persons, wandering about on that side of the city—­indeed on all sides of it—­in a miserable and seemingly half-distracted manner.  As to the choice of the spot, obviously such criminating evidence had better take its chance of being found anywhere, rather than upon himself, or in his possession.  Concerning the reconciliatory nature of the appointed meeting