The question, “What is the Book of Mormon?”—­a very pertinent one on the part of every earnest student and investigator of this phase of American history—­has been partly answered already.  The work has been derisively called the “Mormon Bible,” a name that carries with it the misrepresentation that in the faith of this people the book takes the place of the scriptural volume which is universally accepted by Christian sects.  No designation could be more misleading, and in every way more untruthful.  The Latter-day Saints have but one “Bible” and that the Holy Bible of Christendom.  They place it foremost amongst the standard works of the Church; they accept its admonitions and its doctrines, and accord thereto a literal significance; it is to them, and ever has been, the word of God, a compilation made by human agency of works by various inspired writers; they accept its teachings in fulness, modifying the meaning in no wise, except in the rare cases of undoubted mistranslation, concerning which Biblical scholars of all faiths differ and criticize; and even in such cases their reverence for the sacred letter renders them even more conservative than the majority of Bible commentators and critics in placing free construction upon the text.  The historical part of the Jewish scriptures tells of the divine dealings with the people of the eastern hemisphere; the Book of Mormon recounts the mercies and judgments of God, the inspired teachings of His prophets, the rise and fall of His people as organized communities on the western continent.

The Latter-day Saints believe the coming forth of the Book of Mormon to have been foretold in the Bible, as its destiny is prophesied of within its own lids; it is to the people the true “stick of Ephraim” which Ezekiel declared should become one with the “stick of Judah”—­or the Bible.  The people challenge the most critical comparison between this record of the west and the Holy Scriptures of the east, feeling confident that no discrepancy exists in letter or spirit.  As to the original characters in which the record was engraved, copies were shown to learned linguists of the day and pronounced by them as closely resembling the Reformed Egyptian writing.

Let us revert, however, to the facts of history concerning this new scripture, and the reception accorded the printed volume.

The Book of Mormon was before the world; the Church circulated the work as freely as possible.  The true account of its origin was rejected by the general public, who thus, assumed the responsibility of explaining in some plausible way the source of the record.  Among the many false theories propounded, perhaps the most famous is the so-called Spaulding story.  Solomon Spaulding, a clergyman of Amity, Pennsylvania, died in 1816.  He wrote a romance to which no name other than “Manuscript Story” was given, and which, but for the unauthorized use of the writer’s name and the misrepresentation of his