a great desire to understand affairs: and in order
to that he kept a constant journal of all that
passed, of which he showed me a great deal.
The Duke of Buckingham gave me once a short but severe
character of the two brothers. It was the more
severe, because it was true: the king, (he
said,) could see things if he would: and the
duke would see things if he could. He had no
true judgment, and was soon determined by those
whom he trusted: but he was obstinate against
all other advices. He was bred with high notions
of kingly authority, and laid it down for a maxim,
that all who opposed the king were rebels in their
hearts. He was perpetually in one amour or
other, without being very nice in his choice:
upon which the king once said, he believed his
brother had his mistress given him by his priests
for penance. He was naturally eager and revengeful:
and was against the taking off any, that set up
in an opposition to the measures of the court,
and who by that means grew popular in the house
of commons. He was for rougher methods. He
continued many years dissembling his religion,
and seemed zealous for the church of England, but
it was chiefly on design to hinder all propositions,
that tended to unite us among ourselves. He
was a frugal prince, and brought his court into
method and magnificence, for he had L100,000. a-year
allowed him. He was made high admiral, and he
came to understand all the concerns of the sea
very particularly.”]
His morality and justice, struggling for some time
with prejudice, had at last triumphed, by his acknowledging
for his wife Miss Hyde, maid of honour to the Princess
Royal, whom he had secretly married in Holland.
Her father, from that time prime minister of England,
supported by this new interest, soon rose to the head
of affairs, and had almost ruined them: not that
he wanted capacity, but he was too self-sufficient.
The Duke of Ormond possessed the confidence and esteem
of his master: the greatness of his services,
the splendour of his merit and his birth, and the
fortune he had abandoned in adhering to the fate of
his prince, rendered him worthy of it nor durst the
courtiers even murmur at seeing him grand steward
of the household, first lord of the bed-chamber, and
lord-lieutenant of Ireland. He exactly resembled
the Marshal de Grammont, in the turn of his wit and
the nobleness of his manners: and like him was
the honour of his master’s court.
The Duke of Buckingham and the Earl of St. Albans
were the same in England as they appeared in France:
the one full of wit and vivacity, dissipated, without
splendour, an immense estate upon which he had just
entered: the other, a man of no great genius,
had raised himself a considerable fortune from nothing,
and by losing at play, and keeping a great table,
made it appear greater than it was.