think it best not to set my mind running in a new
path, lest I should take to re-writing.”
Note, by the way, the slovenliness of this epistle,
as coming from so great a master of style; that defect
characterizes all his correspondence. He wrote
for the Press “with all his singing robes about
him”; his letters were unrevised and brief.
Mrs. Simpson, in her pleasant “Memories,”
ascribes to him the eloquence du billet in a supreme
degree. I must confess that of more than five
hundred letters from his pen which I have seen only
six cover more than a single sheet of note-paper, all
are alike careless and unstudied in style, though
often in matter characteristic and informing.
“I am not by nature,” he would say, “a
letter-writer, and habitually think of the uncertainty
as to who may be the reader of anything that I write.
It is my fate, as a writer of history, to have before
me letters never intended for my eyes, and this has
aggravated my foible, and makes me a wretched correspondent.
I should like very much to write letters gracefully
and easily, but I can’t, because it is contrary
to my nature.” “I have got,”
he writes so early as 1873, “to shrink from the
use of the pen; to ask me to write letters is like
asking a lame man to walk; it is not, as horse-dealers
say, ‘the nature of the beast.’ When
others
talk to me charmingly, my answers are short,
faltering, incoherent sentences; so it is with my
writing.” “You,” he says to
another lady correspondent, “have the pleasant
faculty of easy, pleasant letter-writing, in which
I am wholly deficient.”
In fact, the claims of his Crimean book, which compelled
him latterly to refuse all other literary work, gave
little time for correspondence. Its successive
revisions formed his daily task until illness struck
him down. Sacks of Crimean notes, labelled through
some fantastic whim with female Christian names—the
Helen bag, the Adelaide bag, etc.—were
ranged round his room. His working library was
very small in bulk, his habit being to cut out from
any book the pages which would be serviceable, and
to fling the rest away. So, we are told, the
first Napoleon, binding volumes for his travelling
library, shore their margins to the quick, and removed
all prefaces, title-pages, and other superfluous leaves.
So, too, Edward Fitzgerald used to tear out of his
books all that in his judgment fell below their authors’
highest standard, retaining for his own delectation
only the quintessential remnants. Vols.
III. and IV. appeared in 1868, V. in 1875, VI. in
1880, vii. and viii. in 1887; while a Cabinet
Edition of the whole in nine volumes was issued continuously
from 1870 to 1887. Our attempt to appreciate
the book shall be reserved for another chapter.
CHAPTER IV—“THE INVASION OF THE CRIMEA”