“I regret that I cannot, being already engaged.”
“M. Mozart, we really must soon spend a
day together.” “It will give me much
pleasure.” A long pause; at length, “A
propos, are you disposed to write a grand symphony
for me for Corpus Christi day?” “Why not?”
“May I then rely on this?” “Oh, yes!
if I may, with equal confidence, rely on its being
performed, and that it will not fare like the sinfonie
concertante.” This opened the flood-gates;
he excused himself in the best way he could, but did
not find much to say. In short, the symphony [Kochel,
No. 297] was highly approved of; and Le Gros is so
satisfied with it that he says it is his very best
symphony. The andante, however, has not the good
fortune to please him; he declares that it has too
many modulations, and is too long. He derives
this opinion from the audience forgetting to clap
their hands as loudly, and to be as vociferous, as
at the end of the first and last movements. But
this andante is a great favorite
with myself,
as well as with all connoisseurs, amateurs, and the
greater part of those who heard it. It is the
exact reverse of what Le Gros says, for it is both
simple and short. But in order to satisfy him
(and no doubt some others) I have written a fresh
one. Each good in its own way— each
having a different character. The last pleases
me the best. The first good opportunity I have,
I will send you this sinfonie concertante, and also
the “School for the Violin,” some pieces
for the piano, and Vogler’s book ("Ton Wissenschaft
und Kunst"), and then I hope to have your opinion
of them. On August 15th, Ascension Day, my sinfonie,
with the new andante, is to be performed for the second
time. The sinfonie is in Re, the andante in Sol,
for here one must not say in D or in G. Le Gros is
now all for me.
Take comfort and pray without ceasing; this is the
only resource we have. I hope you will cause
a holy mass to be said in Maria Plain and in Loretto.
I have done so here. As for the letter to Herr
Bahr, I don’t think it is necessary to send it
to me; I am not as yet acquainted with him; I only
know that he plays the clarionet well, but is in other
respects no desirable companion, and I do not willingly
associate with such people; no credit is derived from
them, and I really should feel positively ashamed to
give him a letter recommending me to him—even
if he could be of service to me; but it so happens
that he is by no means in good repute here. Many
do not know him at all. Of the two Staunitz,
the junior only is here [Mannheim composer]. The
elder of the two (the veritable Hafeneder composer)
is in London. They are wretched scribblers, gamblers,
and drunkards, and not the kind of people for me.
The one now here has scarcely a coat to his back.
By the by, if Brunetti should ever be dismissed, I
would be glad to recommend a friend of mine to the
Archbishop as first violin; he is a most worthy man,
and very steady. I think he is about forty years
of age, and a widower; his name is Rothfischer.
He is Concertmeister at Kirchheim-Boland, with the
Princess of Nassau-Weilberg [see No. 91]. Entre
nous, he is dissatisfied, for he is no favorite with
his Prince—that is, his music is not.
He urged me to forward his interests, and it would
cause me real pleasure to be of use to him, for never
was there such a kind man.