I have now disabled him from the power of serving
me. Well! but that was not my design. If
I cannot arraign my own conduct, why should I, like
a woman or a child, sit down and lament the disappointment
of chance? But can I acquit myself of all neglect?
Did I not misbehave in putting it into the power of
others to outwit me? But that is impossible to
be avoided. In this a prig is more unhappy than
any other: a cautious man may, in a crowd, preserve
his own pockets by keeping his hands in them; but
while the prig employs his hands in another’s
pocket, how shall he be able to defend his own?
Indeed, in this light, what can be imagined more miserable
than a prig? How dangerous are his acquisitions!
how unsafe, how unquiet his possessions! Why
then should any man wish to be a prig, or where is
his greatness? I answer, in his mind: ’tis
the inward glory, the secret consciousness of doing
great and wonderful actions, which can alone support
the truly great man, whether he be a conqueror,
a tyrant, a statesman, or a prig.
These must bear him up against the private curse and
public imprecation, and, while he is hated and detested
by all mankind, must make him inwardly satisfied with
himself. For what but some such inward satisfaction
as this could inspire men possessed of power, wealth,
of every human blessing which pride, avarice, or luxury
could desire, to forsake their homes, abandon ease
and repose, and at the expense of riches and pleasures,
at the price of labour and hardship, and at the hazard
of all that fortune hath liberally given them, could
send them at the head of a multitude of prigs, called
an army, to molest their neighbours; to introduce rape,
rapine, bloodshed, and every kind of misery among their
own species? What but some such glorious appetite
of mind could inflame princes, endowed with the greatest
honours, and enriched with the most plentiful revenues,
to desire maliciously to rob those subjects of their
liberties who are content to sweat for the luxury,
and to bow down their knees to the pride, of those
very princes? What but this can inspire them
to destroy one half of their subjects, in order to
reduce the rest to an absolute dependence on their
own wills, and on those of their brutal successors?
What other motive could seduce a subject, possessed
of great property in his community, to betray the
interest of his fellow-subjects, of his brethren,
and his posterity, to the wanton disposition of such
princes? Lastly, what less inducement could persuade
the prig to forsake the methods of acquiring a safe,
an honest, and a plentiful livelihood, and, at the
hazard of even life itself, and what is mistaken called
dishonour, to break openly and bravely through the
laws of his country, for uncertain, unsteady, and
unsafe gain? Let me then hold myself contented
with this reflection, that I have been wise though
unsuccessful, and am a cheat though an unhappy
man.”