of Wild had, on his promotion, the same views of dividing some part of the spoil among themselves.  It is no wonder, therefore, they were both so warm on each side.  What may seem more remarkable was, that the debtors, who were entirely unconcerned in the dispute, and who were the destined plunder of both parties, should interest themselves with the utmost violence, some on behalf of Wild, and others in favour of Johnson.  So that all Newgate resounded with wild for ever, Johnson for ever.  And the poor debtors re-echoed the liberties of Newgate, which, in the cant language, signifies plunder, as loudly as the thieves themselves.  In short, such quarrels and animosities happened between them, that they seemed rather the people of two countries long at war with each other than the inhabitants of the same castle.

Wild’s party at length prevailed, and he succeeded to the place and power of Johnson, whom he presently stripped of all his finery; but, when it was proposed that he should sell it and divide the money for the good of the whole, he waved that motion, saying it was not yet time, that he should find a better opportunity, that the cloathes wanted cleaning, with many other pretences, and within two days, to the surprize of many, he appeared in them himself; for which he vouchsafed no other apology than that they fitted him much better than they did Johnson, and that they became him in a much more elegant manner.

This behaviour of Wild greatly incensed the debtors, particularly those by whose means he had been promoted.  They grumbled extremely, and vented great indignation against Wild; when one day a very grave man, and one of much authority among them, bespake them as follows: 

“Nothing sure can be more justly ridiculous than the conduct of those who should lay the lamb in the wolfs way, and then should lament his being devoured.  What a wolf is in a sheep-fold, a great man is in society.  Now, when one wolf is in possession of a sheep-fold, how little would it avail the simple flock to expel him and place another in his stead!  Of the same benefit to us is the overthrowing one prig in favour of another.  And for what other advantage was your struggle?  Did you not all know that Wild and his followers were prigs, as well as Johnson and his?  What then could the contention be among such but that which you have now discovered it to have been?  Perhaps some would say, Is it then our duty tamely to submit to the rapine of the prig who now plunders us for fear of an exchange?  Surely no:  but I answer, It is better to shake the plunder off than to exchange the plunderer.  And by what means can we effect this but by a total change in our manners?  Every prig is a slave.  His own priggish desires, which enslave him, themselves betray him to the tyranny of others.  To preserve, therefore, the liberty of Newgate is to change the manners of Newgate.  Let us, therefore, who are