“For the rest it will be enough to add that this long, gaunt, bony cobbler of old boats was—­was—­(May I take the liberty, Mr. Professor?) a village Huxley of the year One.  The colourless brilliancy of the great teacher’s style, the easy facility with which the drop of light forms itself into a perfect sphere as it falls from his pen, belong indeed to a consummate master of the art of expression, which Adam of course was not; but the mental lucidity, justice, and balance, as well as the reserve of power, and the Shakespearean gaiety of touch, which made the old man one of the most delightful companions in the world, were essentially Huxleian.”]

In truth, it is a right excellent story, though, distinctly in love with Eppie, I can only wonder how you had the heart to treat her so ill.  A girl like that should have had two husbands—­one “wisely ranged for show” and t’other de par amours.

Don’t ruin me with Mrs. Skelton by repeating this, but please remember me very kindly to her.

Ever yours very faithfully,

T.H.  Huxley.

[The following letter to Tyndall was called forth by an incident in connection with the starting of the “Nineteenth Century.”  Huxley had promised to help the editor by looking over the proofs of a monthly article on contemporary science.  But his advertised position as merely adviser in this to the editor was overlooked by some who resented what they supposed to be his assumption of the role of critic in general to his fellow-workers in science.  At a meeting of the x Club, Tyndall made a jesting allusion to this; Huxley, however, thought the mere suggestion too grave for a joke, and replied with all seriousness to clear himself from the possibility of such misconception.  And the same evening he wrote to Tyndall:—­]

Athenaeum Club, Pall Mall, S.W., December 2, 1880.

My dear Tyndall,

I must tell you the ins and outs of this “Nineteenth Century” business.  I was anxious to help Knowles when he started the journal, and at his earnest and pressing request I agreed to do what I have done.  But being quite aware of the misinterpretation to which I should be liable if my name “sans phrase” were attached to the article, I insisted upon the exact words which you will find at the head of it; and which seemed, and still seem to me, to define my position as a mere adviser of the editor.

Moreover, by diligently excluding any expression of opinion on the part of the writers of the compilation, I thought that nobody could possibly suspect me of assuming the position of an authority even on the subjects with which I may be supposed to be acquainted, let alone those such as physics and chemistry, of which I know no more than any one of the public may know.

Therefore your remarks came upon me to-night with the sort of painful surprise which a man feels who is accused of the particular sin of which he flatters himself he is especially not guilty, and “roused my corruption” as the Scotch have it.  But there is no need to say anything about that, for you were generous and good as I have always found you.  Only I pray you, if hereafter it strikes you that any doing of mine should be altered or amended, tell me yourself and privately, and I promise you a very patient listener, and what is more a very thankful one.