So I am working away at my draft—from the point of view of an aesthetic jeweller.
As soon as I get it into such a condition as will need only verbal trimming, I should like to have it set up in type. For it is a defect of mine that I can never judge properly of any composition of my own in manuscript.
Moreover (don’t swear at this wish) I should very much like to send it to you in that shape for criticism.
The Life will be an easy business. I should like to get the book out of hand before Christmas, and will do so if possible. But my lectures begin on Tuesday, and I cannot promise.
Ever yours very faithfully,
T.H. Huxley.
October 21, 1878.
My dear Morley,
I have received slips up to chapter 9 of Hume, and so far I do not think (saving your critical presence) that there will be much need of much modification or interpolation.
I have made all my citations from a 4-volume edition of Hume, published by Black and Tait in 1826, which has long been in my possession.
Do you think I ought to quote Green and Grose’s edition? It will be a great bother, and I really don’t think that the understanding of Hume is improved by going back to eighteenth-century spelling.
I am at work upon the Life, which should not take long. But I wish that I had polished that off at Penmaenmawr as well. What with lecturing five days a week, and toiling at two anatomical monographs, it is hard to find time.
As soon as I have gone through all the eleven chapters about the Philosophy—I will send them to you and get you to come and dine some day—after you have looked at them—and go into it.
Ever yours very faithfully,
T.H. Huxley.
Science Schools, South Kensington, October 29, 1878.
My dear Morley,
Your letter has given me great pleasure. For though I have thoroughly enjoyed the work, and seemed to myself to have got at the heart of Hume’s way of thinking, I could not tell how it would appear to others, still less could I pretend to judge of the literary form of what I had written. And as I was quite prepared to accept your judgment if it had been unfavourable, so being what it is, I hug myself proportionately and begin to give myself airs as a man of letters.
I am through all the interesting part of Hume’s life—that is, the struggling part of it—and David the successful and the feted begins rather to bore me, as I am sorry to say most successful people do. I hope to send the first chapter to press in another week.
Might it not be better, by the way, to divide the little book into two parts?
Part 1.—Life, Literary and Political work,
Part 2.—Philosophy,
subdividing the latter into chapters or sections? please tell me what you think.
I have not received the last chapter from the printer yet. When I do I will finish revising, and then ask you to come and have a symposium over it.