“My spirit has pass’d in compassion and determination around the
     whole earth;
  I have look’d for equals and lovers, and found them ready for me
     in all lands;
  I think some divine rapport has equalized me with them.

 “O vapors!  I think I have risen with you and moved away to distant
     continents, and fallen down there for reasons;
  I think I have blown with you, O winds;
  O waters, I have finger’d every shore with you.”

Indeed, the whole book is leavened with vehement Comradeship.  Not only in the relations of individuals to each other shall loving good-will exist and be cultivated,—­not only between the different towns and cities, and all the States of this indissoluble, compacted Union,—­but it shall make a tie of fraternity and fusion holding all the races and peoples and countries of the whole earth.

Then the National question.  As Whitman’s completed works now stand, in their two volumes, it is certain they could only have grown out of the Secession War; and they will probably go to future ages as in literature the most characteristic identification of that war,—­ risen from and portraying it, representing its sea of passions and progresses, partaking of all its fierce movements and perturbed emotions, and yet sinking the mere military parts of that war, great as those were, below and with matters far greater, deeper, more human, more expanding, and more enduring.

I must not close this paper without some reference to Walt Whitman’s prose writings, which are scarcely less important than his poems.  Never has Patriotism, never has the antique Love of Country, with even doubled passion and strength, been more fully expressed than in these contributions.  They comprise two thin volumes,—­now included in “Two Rivulets,”—­called “Democratic Vistas” and “Memoranda during the War;” the former exhibiting the personality of the poet in more vehement and sweeping action even than do the poems, and affording specimens of soaring vaticination and impassioned appeal impossible to match in the literature of our time.  The only living author suggested is Carlyle; but so much is added, the presence is so much more vascular and human, and the whole page so saturated with faith and love and democracy, that even the great Scotchman is overborne.  Whitman, too, radiates belief, while at the core of Carlyle’s utterances is despair.  The style here is eruptive and complex, or what Jeremy Taylor calls agglomerative, and puts the Addisonian models utterly to rout,—­a style such as only the largest and most Titanic workman could effectively use.  A sensitive lady of my acquaintance says reading the “Vistas” is like being exposed to a pouring hailstorm,—­the words fairly bruise her mind.  In its literary construction the book is indeed a shower, or a succession of showers, multitudinous, wide-stretching, down-pouring,—­the wrathful bolt and the quick veins of poetic fire lighting up the page from time to time.  I can easily conceive how certain minds must be swayed and bent by some of these long, involved, but firm and vehement passages.  I cannot deny myself the pleasure of quoting one or two pages.  The writer is referring to the great literary relics of past times:—­