The character of the absolute knower’s picture is however so impossible for us to represent clearly, that we may fairly suppose that the authority which absolute monism undoubtedly possesses, and probably always will possess over some persons, draws its strength far less from intellectual than from mystical grounds.  To interpret absolute monism worthily, be a mystic.  Mystical states of mind in every degree are shown by history, usually tho not always, to make for the monistic view.  This is no proper occasion to enter upon the general subject of mysticism, but I will quote one mystical pronouncement to show just what I mean.  The paragon of all monistic systems is the Vedanta philosophy of Hindostan, and the paragon of Vedantist missionaries was the late Swami Vivekananda who visited our shores some years ago.  The method of Vedantism is the mystical method.  You do not reason, but after going through a certain discipline you see, and having seen, you can report the truth.  Vivekananda thus reports the truth in one of his lectures here: 

“Where is any more misery for him who sees this Oneness in the Universe...this Oneness of life, Oneness of everything? ...This separation between man and man, man and woman, man and child, nation from nation, earth from moon, moon from sun, this separation between atom and atom is the cause really of all the misery, and the Vedanta says this separation does not exist, it is not real.  It is merely apparent, on the surface.  In the heart of things there is Unity still.  If you go inside you find that Unity between man and man, women and children, races and races, high and low, rich and poor, the gods and men:  all are One, and animals too, if you go deep enough, and he who has attained to that has no more delusion. ...  Where is any more delusion for him?  What can delude him?  He knows the reality of everything, the secret of everything.  Where is there any more misery for him?  What does he desire?  He has traced the reality of everything unto the Lord, that centre, that Unity of everything, and that is Eternal Bliss, Eternal Knowledge, Eternal Existence.  Neither death nor disease, nor sorrow nor misery, nor discontent is there ... in the centre, the reality, there is no one to be mourned for, no one to be sorry for.  He has penetrated everything, the Pure One, the Formless, the Bodiless, the Stainless, He the Knower, He the Great Poet, the Self-Existent, He who is giving to everyone what he deserves.”

Observe how radical the character of the monism here is.  Separation is not simply overcome by the One, it is denied to exist.  There is no many.  We are not parts of the One; It has no parts; and since in a sense we undeniably are, it must be that each of us is the One, indivisibly and totally.  An absolute one, and I that one—­surely we have here a religion which, emotionally considered, has a high pragmatic value; it imparts a perfect sumptuosity of security.  As our Swami says in another place: