From this somewhat incoherent note we may assume that the Ms. was written in the course of the year 1787 by the notorious Syrian ecclesiastic Dom Denis Chavis, the accomplice of Cazotte in the extraordinary literary atrocity shortly afterward perpetrated by the latter under the name of a sequel or continuation of the Thousand and One Nights [FN#6] (v.  Cabinet des Fees, vols. xxxviii—­xli), [FN#7] and in all probability (cf. the mention in the above note of the first part, i.e.  Nights CCLXXXI-CCCCXXVII, as the fourth volume) to supply the place of Galland’s missing fourth volume for the Bibliotheque Royale; but there. is nothing, except a general similarity of style and the occurrence in the former of the rest of Camaralzaman and (though not in the same order) of four of the tales supposed to have been contained in the latter, to show that Dom Chavis made his copy from a text identical with that used by the French savant.  In the notes to his edition of the Arabic text of Aladdin, M. Zotenberg gives a number of extracts from this Ms., from which it appears that it is written in a very vulgar modern Syrian style and abounds in grammatical errors, inconsistencies and incoherences of every description, to say nothing of the fact that the Syrian ecclesiastic seems, with the characteristic want of taste and presumption which might be expected from the joint-author of “Les Veillees Persanes,” to have, to a considerable extent, garbled the original text by the introduction of modern European phrases and turns of speech a la Galland.  For the rest, the Ms. contains no note or other indication, on which we can found any opinion as to the source from which the transcriber (or arranger) drew his materials; but it can hardly be doubted, from internal evidence, that he had the command of some genuine text of the Nights, similar to, if not identical with, that of Galland, which he probably “arranged” to suit his own (and his century’s) distorted ideas of literary fitness.  The discovery of the interpolated tales contained in this Ms. (which has thus presumably lain unnoticed for a whole century, under, as one may say, the very noses of the many students of Arabic literature who would have rejoiced in such a find) has, by a curious freak of fortune, been delayed until our own day in consequence of a singular mistake made by a former conservator of the Paris Bibliotheque, the well-known Orientalist, M. Reinaud, who, in drawing up the Catalogue of the Arabic MSS. in the collection described (or rather misdescribed) it under the following heading: 

“Supplement Arabe 1716.  Thousand and One Nights, 3rd and 4th parts.  This volume begins with Night CCLXXXII and ends with Night DCXXXI.  A copy in the handwriting of Chavis.  It is from this copy and in accordance with the instructions (d’apres la indications) of this Syrian monk that Cazotte composed (redigea) the Sequel to the Thousand and One Nights, Cabinet des Fees, " xxxvii et xl (should be tt. xxxviii-xli).”