14.  Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the Church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord: 

15.  And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him.

The Peculiars obey these instructions and dispense with doctors.  They are therefore prosecuted for manslaughter when their children die.

When I was a young man, the Peculiars were usually acquitted.  The prosecution broke down when the doctor in the witness box was asked whether, if the child had had medical attendance, it would have lived.  It was, of course, impossible for any man of sense and honor to assume divine omniscience by answering this in the affirmative, or indeed pretending to be able to answer it at all.  And on this the judge had to instruct the jury that they must acquit the prisoner.  Thus a judge with a keen sense of law (a very rare phenomenon on the Bench, by the way) was spared the possibility of leaving to sentence one prisoner (under the Blasphemy laws) for questioning the authority of Scripture, and another for ignorantly and superstitiously accepting it as a guide to conduct.  To-day all this is changed.  The doctor never hesitates to claim divine omniscience, nor to clamor for laws to punish any scepticism on the part of laymen.  A modern doctor thinks nothing of signing the death certificate of one of his own diphtheria patients, and then going into the witness box and swearing a peculiar into prison for six months by assuring the jury, on oath, that if the prisoner’s child, dead of diphtheria, had been placed under his treatment instead of that of St. James, it would not have lived.  And he does so not only with impunity, but with public applause, though the logical course would be to prosecute him either for the murder of his own patient or for perjury in the case of St. James.  Yet no barrister, apparently, dreams of asking for the statistics of the relative case-mortality in diphtheria among the Peculiars and among the believers in doctors, on which alone any valid opinion could be founded.  The barrister is as superstitious as the doctor is infatuated; and the Peculiar goes unpitied to his cell, though nothing whatever has been proved except that his child does without the interference of a doctor as effectually as any of the hundreds of children who die every day of the same diseases in the doctor’s care.

RECOIL OF THE DOGMA OF MEDICAL INFALLIBILITY ON THE DOCTOR