The savings we propose in entitlement programs will total some $63 billion over 4 Years and will, without affecting social t security, go a long way toward bringing Federal spending under control.

But don’t be fooled by those who proclaim that spending cuts will deprive the elderly, the needy, and the helpless.  The.  Federal Government will still subsidize 95 million meals every day.  That’s one out of seven of all the meals served in America.  Head Start, senior nutrition programs, and child welfare programs will not be cut from the levels we proposed last year.  More than one-half billion dollars has been proposed for minority business assistance.  And research at the National Institute of Health will be increased by over $100 million.  While meeting all these needs, we intend to plug unwarranted tax loopholes and strengthen the law which requires all large corporations to pay a minimum tax.

I am confident the economic program we’ve put into operation will protect the needy while it triggers a recovery that will benefit all Americans.  It will stimulate the economy, result in increased savings and provide capital for expansion, mortgages for homebuilding, and jobs for the unemployed.

Now that the essentials of that program are in place, our next major undertaking must be a program—­just as bold, just as innovative—­to make government again accountable to the people, to make our system of federalism work again.

Our citizens feel they’ve lost control of even the most basic decisions made about the essential services of government, such as schools, welfare, roads, and even garbage collection.  And they’re right.  A maze of interlocking jurisdictions and levels of government confronts average citizens in trying to solve even the simplest of problems.  They don’t know where to turn for answers, who to hold accountable, who to praise, who to blame, who to vote for or against.  The main reason for this is the overpowering growth of Federal grants-in-aid programs during the past few decades.

In 1960 the Federal Government had 132 categorical grant programs, costing $7 billion.  When I took office, there were approximately 500, costing nearly a hundred billion dollars—­13 programs for energy, 36 for pollution control, 66 for social services, 90 for education.  And here in the Congress, it takes at least 166 committees just to try to keep track of them.

You know and I know that neither the President nor the Congress can properly oversee this jungle of grants-in-aid; indeed, the growth of these grants has led to the distortion in the vital functions of government.  As one Democratic Governor put it recently:  The National Government should be worrying about “arms control, not potholes.”

The growth in these Federal programs has—­in the words of one intergovernmental commission—­made the Federal Government “more pervasive, more intrusive, more unmanageable, more ineffective and costly, and above all, more (un) accountable.”  Let’s solve this problem with a single, bold stroke:  the return of some $47 billion in Federal programs to State and local government, together with the means to finance them and a transition period of nearly 10 years to avoid unnecessary disruption.