2.  Provision of technical advice and assistance to business as a whole on production, research, and management problems.  This will help equalize competitive relationships between large and small companies, for many of the small companies cannot afford expensive technical research, accounting, and tax advice.

3.  Elimination of trade practices and agreements which reduce competition and discriminate against new or small enterprises.

We speak a great deal about the free enterprise economy of our country.  It is competition that keeps it free.  It is competition that keeps it growing and developing.  The truth is that we need far more competition in the future than we have had in the immediate past.

By strangling competition, monopolistic activity prevents or deters investment in new or expanded production facilities.  This lessens the opportunity for employment and chokes off new outlets for idle savings.  Monopoly maintains prices at artificially high levels and reduces consumption which, with lower prices, would rise and support larger production and higher employment.  Monopoly, not being subject to competitive pressure, is slow to take advantage of technical advances which would lower prices or improve quality.  All three of these monopolistic activities very directly lower the standard of living—­through higher prices and lower quality of product—­which free competition would improve.

The Federal Government must protect legitimate business and consumers from predatory and monopolistic practices by the vigilant enforcement of regulatory legislation.  The program will be designed to have a maximum impact upon monopolistic bottlenecks and unfair competitive practices hindering expansion in employment.

During the war, enforcement of antimonopoly laws was suspended in a number of fields.  The Government must now take major steps not only to maintain enforcement of antitrust laws but to encourage new and competing enterprises in every way.  The deferred demand of the war years and the large accumulations of liquid assets provide ample incentive for expansion.  Equalizing of business opportunity, under full and free competition, must be a prime responsibility in the reconversion period and in the years that follow.  Many leading businessmen have recognized the importance of such action both to themselves and to the economy as a whole.

But we must do more than break up trusts and monopolies after they have begun to strangle competition.  We must take positive action to foster new, expanding enterprises.  By legislation and by administration we must take specific steps to discourage the formation or the strengthening of competition-restricting business.  We must have an over-all antimonopoly policy which can be applied by all agencies of the Government in exercising the functions assigned to them—­a policy designed to encourage the formation and growth of new and freely competitive enterprises.