I do not possess, nor ever looked into one of the books you specify; nor Mabillon’s “Acta Sanctorum,” nor O’Flaherty’s “Ogygia.”  My reading has been very idle., and trifling, and desultory; not that perhaps it has not been employed on authors as respectable as those you want to consult, nor that I had not rather read the deeds of sinners than Acta Sanctorum.  I have no reverence but for sensible books, and consequently not for a greater number; and had rather have read fewer than I have than more.  The rest may be useful on certain points, as they happen now to be to you; who, I am sure, would not read them for general use and pleasure, and are a very different kind of author.  I shall like, I dare to say, any thing you do write, but I am not overjoyed at your wading into the history of dark ages’ unless you use it as a canvass to be embroidered with your opinions, and episodes, and comparisons with more recent times.  That is a most entertaining kind of writing.  In general, I have seldom wasted time on the origin of nations, unless for an opportunity of smiling at the gravity of the author, or at the absurdity of the manners of those ages; for absurdity and bravery compose almost all the anecdotes we have of them, except the accounts of what they never did, nor thought of doing.  I have a real affection for Bishop Hoadley:  he stands with me in lieu of what are called the Fathers; and I am much obliged to you for offering to lend me a book of his:  but, as my faith in him and his doctrines has long been settled, I shall not return to such grave studies, when I have so little time left, and desire only to pass it ’tranquilly, and without thinking of what I can neither propagate nor correct.  When youth made me sanguine, I hoped mankind might be set right.  Now that I am very, old, I sit down with this lazy maxim; that, unless one could cure men of being fools, it is to no purpose to cure them of any folly, as it is only making room for some other.  Self-interest is thought to govern every man yet, is it possible to be less governed by self-interest than men are in the aggregate?  Do not thousands sacrifice even their lives for single men?  Is not it an established rule in France, that every person in that kingdom should love every king they have in his turn?  What government is formed for general happiness?  Where is not it thought heresy by the majority, to insinuate that the felicity of one man ought not to be preferred to that Of Millions?  Had not I better, at sixty-eight, leave men to these preposterous notions, than return to Bishop Hoadley, and sigh?  Not but I have a heartfelt satisfaction when I hear that a mind as liberal as his, and who has dared to utter sacred truths, meets with approbation and purchasers of his work.  You must not, however, flatter yourself, Sir, that all your purchasers are admirers.  Some will buy your book, because they have heard of opinions in it that offend them, and because they want to find matter in it for abusing you.  Let them:  the more it is discussed, the more strongly Will your fame be established.  I commend you for scorning any artifice to puff your book; but you must allow me to hope it will be attacked.