Charlemagne of France, Canute the Dane, William of
Normandy the English kings are entirely absent, nor
is there a word concerning Roman games or the edict
which refers to them in which Chess and Draughts (both
mentioned) were specially protected and exempted from
the interdiction against other games; which has escaped
all writers, and would certainly, if known about,
have been deemed of some significance. The Persian
and Arabian periods from the time of Chosroes, to
Harun, covers the Golden Age of Arabian literature,
which is more prolific in chess incident than any
other; yet even this and Firdausi’s celebrated
Persian Shahnama, and Anna Comnena’s historical
work escapes notice. We may perhaps, not implicitly
trust or credit, all we read of in some of the Eastern
manuscripts biographical sketches; but there is much
of reasonable narrative we need not discredit nor
reject. We may feel disposed to accept, with
some reservation, the account of the 6,000 male and
6,000 female slaves, and 60,000 horses of Al Mutasem,
(the eighth of Abbasside). The prodigious bridal
expenditure, comprising gifts of Estates, houses,
jewels, horses, described in the history of Al Mamun
(the seventh of Abbasside, and the most glorious of
his race), may seem fabulous to us; the extraordinary
memories of certain scholars narrated in biographies,
who could recite thousands of verses and whole books
by heart may appear worthy of confirmation; the composition
of two thousand manuscripts by one writer, and the
possession of forty thousand volumes by another, may
somewhat tax our credulity. We may feel a little
surprised to hear that Chosroes’ chess men were
worth an amount equivalent to one million of our money
in the present day; we may doubt, or disagree with
the opinions attributed to Hippocrates, or to Galen;
that cures were effected, or even assisted of such
complaints as diarrhea and erysipelas by the means
of chess; or, that, as the Persian suggests it has
been found a remedy of beneficial in many ailments
from the heart ache to the tooth ache. We may
doubt whether the two Lydian brothers, Lydo and Tyrrhene,
in the story of Herodotus really diminished the pangs
of hunger much by it; but, amidst all our incredulity,
we can believe, and do believe, that Chosroes and
chess, Harun and chess, Charlemagne and chess, Al
Mamun and chess, Canute and chess, are as well authenticated
and worthy of credit, as other more important incidents
found in history, notwithstanding that encyclopaediasts
and writers down from the days of the Eastern manuscripts,
the Persian Shahnama and Anna Comnenas history to
the days of Pope and Philidor, and of the initiation
of Sanskrit knowledge among the learned, never mention
their names in connection with chess as exponents
of which the Ravan, king of Lanka of the Hindoo law
books, the famous prince Yudhisthira and the sage
Vyasa of the Sanskrit, and Nala of the poems, and
in more modern accounts, Indian King Porus, Alexander
the Great and Aristotle, are far more reasonable names
inferentially, if not sufficiently attested, than
those cherished by traditionists such as Palamedes,
Xerxes, Moses, Hermes, or any of the Kings of Babylon
or their philosophers.