“I wish to know,” wrote the Advocate to Caron, “from whom the Archbishop of Canterbury received the advices concerning Vorstius in order to find out what is meant by all this.”

It will be remembered that Whitgift was of opinion that James was directly inspired by the Holy Ghost, and that as he affected to deem him the anointed High-priest of England, it was natural that he should encourage the King in his claims to be ‘Pontifex maximus’ for the Netherlands likewise.

“We are busy here,” continued Barneveld, “in examining all things for the best interests of the country and the churches.  I find the nobles and cities here well resolved in this regard, although there be some disagreements ‘in modo.’  Vorstius, having been for many years professor and minister of theology at Steinfurt, having manifested his learning in many books written against the Jesuits, and proved himself pure and moderate in doctrine, has been called to the vacant professorship at Leyden.  This appointment is now countermined by various means.  We are doing our best to arrange everything for the highest good of the Provinces and the churches.  Believe this and believe nothing else.  Pay heed to no other information.  Remember what took place in Flanders, events so well known to you.  It is not for me to pass judgment in these matters.  Do you, too, suspend your judgment.”

The Advocate’s allusion was to the memorable course of affairs in Flanders at an epoch when many of the most inflammatory preachers and politicians of the Reformed religion, men who refused to employ a footman or a housemaid not certified to be thoroughly orthodox, subsequently after much sedition and disturbance went over to Spain and the Catholic religion.

A few weeks later Barneveld sent copies to Caron of the latest harangues of Winwood in the Assembly and the reply of My Lords on the Vorstian business; that is to say, the freshest dialogue on predestination between the King and the Advocate.  For as James always dictated word for word the orations of his envoy, so had their Mightinesses at this period no head and no mouthpiece save Barneveld alone.  Nothing could be drearier than these controversies, and the reader shall be spared as much, as possible the infliction of reading them.  It will be necessary, however, for the proper understanding of subsequent events that he should be familiar with portions of the Advocate’s confidential letters.

“Sound well the gentleman you wot of,” said Barneveld, “and other personages as to the conclusive opinions over there.  The course of the propositions does not harmonize with what I have myself heard out of the King’s mouth at other times, nor with the reports of former ambassadors.  I cannot well understand that the King should, with such preciseness, condemn all other opinions save those of Calvin and Beza.  It is important to the service of this country that one should know the final intention of his Majesty.”