But already the first mutterings of the storm were audible.  A bird in the air had whispered to the Queen that her favourite was inclined to disobedience.  “Some flying tale hath been told me here,” wrote Leicester to Walsingham, “that her Majesty should mislike my name of Excellency.  But if I had delighted, or would have received titles, I refused a title higher than Excellency, as Mr. Davison, if you ask him, will tell you; and that I, my own self, refused most earnestly that, and, if I might have done it, this also.”  Certainly, if the Queen objected to this common form of address, which had always been bestowed upon Leicester, as he himself observed, ever since she had made him an earl, it might be supposed that her wrath would mount high when she should hear of him as absolute governor-general.  It is also difficult to say what higher title he had refused, for certainly the records show that he had refused nothing, in the way of power and dignity, that it was possible for him to obtain.

But very soon afterwards arrived authentic intelligence that the Queen had been informed of the proposition made on New Year’s-Day (O.S.), and that, although she could not imagine the possibility of his accepting, she was indignant that he had not peremptorily rejected the offer.

“As to the proposal made to you,” wrote Burghley, “by the mouth of Leoninus, her Majesty hath been informed that you had thanked them in her name, and alledged that there was no such thing in the contract, and that therefore you could not accept nor knew how to answer the same.”

Now this information was obviously far from correct, although it had been furnished by the Earl himself to Burghley.  We have seen that Leicester had by no means rejected, but very gratefully entertained, the proposition as soon as made.  Nevertheless the Queen was dissatisfied, even without suspecting that she had been directly disobeyed.  “Her Majesty,” continued the Lord-Treasurer; “is much offended with this proceeding.  She allows not that you should give them thanks, but findeth it very strange that you did not plainly declare to them that they did well know how often her Majesty had refused to have any one for her take any such government there, and that she had always so answered peremptorily.  Therefore there might be some suspicion conceived that by offering on their part, and refusal on hers, some further mischief might be secretly hidden by some odd person’s device to the hurt of the cause.  But in that your Lordship did not flatly say to them that yourself did know her Majesty’s mind therein, that she never meant, in this sort, to take the absolute government, she is offended considering, as she saith, that none knew her determination therein better than yourself.  For at your going hence, she did peremptorily charge you not to accept any such title and office; and therefore her straight commandment now is that you shall not accept the same, for she will never assent thereto, nor avow you with any such title.”