The commissioners, having read this letter to Lord Salisbury before communicating it to the King, did not find the Lord Treasurer very prompt or sympathetic in his reply.  There had evidently been much jealousy at the English court of the confidential and intimate relations recently established with Henry, to which allusions were made in the documents read at the present conference.  Cecil, while expressing satisfaction in formal terms at the friendly language of the States, and confidence in the sincerity of their friendship for his sovereign, intimated very plainly that more had passed between the late king and the authorities of the Republic than had been revealed by either party to the King of Great Britain, or than could be understood from the letters and papers now communicated.  He desired further information from the commissioners, especially in regard to those articles of their instructions which referred to a general rupture.  They professed inability to give more explanations than were contained in the documents themselves.  If suspicion was felt, they said, that the French King had been proposing anything in regard to a general rupture, either on account of the retreat of Conde, the affair of Savoy, or anything else, they would reply that the ambassadors in France had been instructed to decline committing the States until after full communication and advice and ripe deliberation with his British Majesty and council, as well as the Assembly of the States-General; and it had been the intention of the late king to have conferred once more and very confidentially with Prince Maurice and Count Lewis William before coming to a decisive resolution.

It was very obvious however to the commissioners that their statement gave no thorough satisfaction, and that grave suspicions remained of something important kept back by them.  Cecil’s manner was constrained and cold, and certainly there were no evidences of profound sorrow at the English court for the death of Henry.

“The King of France,” said the High Treasurer, “meant to make a master-stroke—­a coup de maistre—­but he who would have all may easily lose all.  Such projects as these should not have been formed or taken in hand without previous communication with his Majesty of Great Britain.”

All arguments on the part of the ambassadors to induce the Lord Treasurer or other members of the government to enlarge the succour intended for the Cleve affair were fruitless.  The English troops regularly employed in the States’ service might be made use of with the forces sent by the Republic itself.  More assistance than this it was idle to expect, unless after a satisfactory arrangement with the present regency of France.  The proposition, too, of the States for a close and general alliance was coldly repulsed.  “No resolution can be taken as to that,” said Cecil; “the death of the French king has very much altered such matters.”

At a little later hour on the same day the commissioners, according to previous invitation, dined with the King.