The Prince received them at first with courtesy.  “It is the work of the States-General,” he said, " no harm shall come to your father any more than to myself.”

Veenhuyzen sought to excuse the opposition which the Advocate had made to the Cloister Church.

The word was scarcely out of his mouth when the Prince fiercely interrupted him—­“Any man who says a word against the Cloister Church,” he cried in a rage, “his feet shall not carry him from this place.”

The interview gave them on the whole but little satisfaction.  Very soon afterwards two gentlemen, Asperen and Schagen, belonging to the Chamber of Nobles, and great adherents of Barneveld, who had procured their enrolment in that branch, forced their way into the Stadholder’s apartments and penetrated to the door of the room where the Advocate was imprisoned.  According to Carleton they were filled with wine as well as rage, and made a great disturbance, loudly demanding their patron’s liberation.  Maurice came out of his own cabinet on hearing the noise in the corridor, and ordered them to be disarmed and placed under arrest.  In the evening however they were released.

Soon afterwards van der Myle fled to Paris, where he endeavoured to make influence with the government in favour of the Advocate.  His departure without leave, being, as he was, a member of the Chamber of Nobles and of the council of state, was accounted a great offence.  Uytenbogaert also made his escape, as did Taurinus, author of The Balance, van Moersbergen of Utrecht, and many others more or less implicated in these commotions.

There was profound silence in the States of Holland when the arrest of Barneveld was announced.  The majority sat like men distraught.  At last Matenesse said, “You have taken from us our head, our tongue, and our hand, henceforth we can only sit still and look on.”

The States-General now took the responsibility of the arrest, which eight individuals calling themselves the States-General had authorized by secret resolution the day before (28th August).  On the 29th accordingly, the following “Billet,” as it was entitled, was read to the Assembly and ordered to be printed and circulated among the community.  It was without date or signature.

“Whereas in the course of the changes within the city of Utrecht and in other places brought about by the high and mighty Lords the States-General of the United Netherlands, through his Excellency and their Lordships’ committee to him adjoined, sundry things have been discovered of which previously there had been great suspicion, tending to the great prejudice of the Provinces in general and of each province in particular, not without apparent danger to the state of the country, and that thereby not only the city of Utrecht, but various other cities of the United Provinces would have fallen into a blood bath; and whereas the chief ringleaders in these things are considered to be John van Barneveld, Advocate of Holland,