Nor was the Envoy at first desirous of remaining.  He had felt after Henry’s death and Sully’s disgrace, and the complete transformation of the France which he had known, that his power of usefulness was gone.  “Our enemies,” he said, “have got the advantage which I used to have in times past, and I recognize a great coldness towards us, which is increasing every day.”  Nevertheless, he yielded reluctantly to Barneveld’s request that he should for the time at least remain at his post.  Later on, as the intrigues against him began to unfold themselves, and his faithful services were made use of at home to blacken his character and procure his removal, he refused to resign, as to do so would be to play into the hands of his enemies, and by inference at least to accuse himself of infidelity to his trust.

But his concealed rage and his rancor grew more deadly every day.  He was fully aware of the plots against him, although he found it difficult to trace them to their source.

“I doubt not,” he wrote to Jacques de Maldere, the distinguished diplomatist and senator, who had recently returned from his embassy to England, “that this beautiful proposition of de Russy has been sent to your Province of Zealand.  Does it not seem to you a plot well woven as well in Holland as at this court to remove me from my post with disreputation?  What have I done that should cause the Queen to disapprove my proceedings?  Since the death of the late king I have always opposed the Third, which they have been trying to fix upon the treasury, on the ground that Henry never spoke to me of restitution, that the receipts given were simple ones, and that the money given was spent for the common benefit of France and the States under direction of the King’s government.  But I am expected here to obey M. de Villeroy, who says that it was the intention of the late king to oblige us to make the payment.  I am not accustomed to obey authority if it be not supported by reason.  It is for my masters to reply and to defend me.  The Queen has no reason to complain.  I have maintained the interests of my superiors.  But this is not the cause of the complaints.  My misfortune is that all my despatches have been sent from Holland in copy to this court.  Most of them contained free pictures of the condition and dealings of those who govern here.  M. de Villeroy has found himself depicted often, and now under pretext of a public negotiation he has found an opportunity of revenging himself . . . .  Besides this cause which Villeroy has found for combing my head, Russy has given notice here that I have kept my masters in the hopes of being honourably exempted from the claims of this government.  The long letter which I wrote to M. de Barneveld justifies my proceedings.”