His own; and I confess that I feel most keenly the joy which is shared in by the whole Church of God.  There is none that has received more wrong from these murderers than I have done, and I esteem myself happy in the midst of my miseries that God has permitted me to see some vengeance.  These beginnings make me hope that I shall see yet more, which will be not less useful to the good, both in your country and in these isles.”

There was no disguise as to the impoverished condition to which the Nassau family had been reduced by the self-devotion of its chief.  They were obliged to ask alms of England, until the “sapling should become a tree.”—­“Since it is the will of God,” wrote the Princess to Davison, “I am not ashamed to declare the necessity of our house, for it is in His cause that it has fallen.  I pray you, Sir, therefore to do me and these children the favour to employ your thoughts in this regard.”  If there had been any strong French proclivities on their part—­as had been so warmly asserted—­they were likely to disappear.  Villiers, who had been a confidential friend of William the Silent, and a strong favourer of France, in vain endeavoured to keep alive the ancient sentiments towards that country, although he was thought to be really endeavouring to bring about a submission of the Nassaus to Spain.  “This Villiers,” said Leicester, “is a most vile traitorous knave, and doth abuse a young nobleman here extremely, the Count Maurice.  For all his religion, he is a more earnest persuader secretly to have him yield to a reconciliation than Sainte Aldegonde was.  He shall not tarry ten days neither in Holland nor Zeeland.  He is greatly hated here of all sorts, and it shall go hard but I will win the young Count.”

As for Hohenlo, whatever his opinions might once have been regarding the comparative merits of Frenchmen and Englishmen, he was now warmly in favour of England, and expressed an intention of putting an end to the Villiers’ influence by simply drowning Villiers.  The announcement of this summary process towards the counsellor was not untinged with rudeness towards the pupil.  “The young Count,” said Leicester, “by Villiers’ means, was not willing to have Flushing rendered, which the Count Hollock perceiving, told the Count Maurice, in a great rage, that if he took any course than that of the Queen of England, and swore by no beggars, he would drown his priest in the haven before his face, and turn himself and his mother-in-law out of their house there, and thereupon went with Mr. Davison to the delivery of it.”  Certainly, if Hohenlo permitted himself such startling demonstrations towards the son and widow of William the Silent, it must have been after his habitual potations had been of the deepest.  Nevertheless it was satisfactory for the new chieftain to know that the influence of so vehement a partisan was secured for England.  The Count’s zeal deserved gratitude upon Leicester’s part, and Leicester was grateful.  “This